Posts Tagged ‘endometrium’

I’m a little confused on the uptake of progesterone during the 2ww. In a previous question, your feedback: “There are different ways of administering the progesterone and this is mostly industry and market driven, as numerous randomised trials have shown all to be of equal efficacy with the exception of oral administration which has been shown to be not sufficient.” A friend just had a failed IVF and it was suggested that she should use POI shots instead of peccaries next time round with her FET. Why isn’t POI’s prescribed in the first place? Why risk the possibility of under absorption if it can be prevented with PIOs? It seems common sense that intra muscular uptake would be better than transvaginal.

Friday, June 13th, 2008

The meaning of a randomised controlled trial is that during the trial, 2 subjects are run head to head and the results analysed as to which is the best. There is no difference in the absorption between intra muscular and vaginal progesterone at all – this has been proven numerous times. So therefore, common sense does not prevail in this instance. It is up to the attending physician in consultation with the patient to decide which form of progesterone supplementation will be used to support the luteal phase. Most people would prefer not to have a painful injection, one that is not without side effects I might add, if there is a less invasive and proven equally effective method such as vaginal pessaries in the correct dose.

With regards to your friend as mentioned in the question: We have a very similar case in the clinic at the moment and the only reason why we have decided to change to the injectable progesterone is because the discharge that follows the insertion of the pessary is socially not acceptable to her.

- Week 16 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

Have you ever heard of the Endometrial Function Test, and if so, what’s your opinion, will it possibly become a standard pre-IVF test, would you clinic make use of this test, nd if not, why not. See: http://www.med.yale.edu/obgyn/kliman/infertility/dx/diagwelcome.html

Sunday, June 1st, 2008

The “endometrial function test” is not a new concept. It will never and should never become a standard pre-IVF test. The literature is very divided on this topic as there is literature to show that the results are of no value in patients with normal healthy uteri. At our clinic the test is performed when there is a clear indication that it may be of some value in establishing a diagnosis. This is usually when the endometrium does not respond in a way that would be adequate for the situation, for example a thin endometrium with appropriate estrogen levels as measured in the blood.

- Week 15 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

Could being a diabetic be the cause of not ovulating and having an extremely thin endometrium that does not thicken?

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

No. Not ovulating is the cause for the thin endometrium as there is no estrogen production to grow it. Diabetes is however not a reason for this and the problem should be sought elsewhere (reasons for anovulation)

- Week 10 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

I have experienced light bleeding/pink discharge a few times after intercourse. Especially midway through the luteal phase, and especially during stimulated cycles. What is the cause of this? Does it indicate good endometrial development? Possible implantation bleeding? Anything else?

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

If your gynaecologist has excluded a local cervical reason for the post coital bleeding, then it is probably due to the mild drop in the estrogen level post ovulation This might lead to sloughing of the top cell layers of the endometrium leading to the slight bleeding.It has been suggested that should the patient be symptomatic, that endometriosis should be excluded.

- Week 8 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

What is the ideal thickness of the uterine lining at time of ovulation (CD14) in order to conduct successful implantation when embryo arrives? Can the endometrium be too thick (how thick is too thick) or too thin (how thin is too thin)?

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

The ideal thickness is between 7 mm and 14 mm . There are however patients that will conceive if it is less than 7mm or more than 14mm. This is however in a minority of cases.

- Week 7 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

Why is ‘normal’ insulin and glucose necessary for a successful IVF cycle, even when donor eggs are used? Does high levels influence the endometrium or the body’s ability to carry a pregnancy full term?

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

High levels of insulin leads to the production of insulin growth factor. This in turn is very similar at a molecular level to Luteinising hormone and abnormal high levels of insulin are potentially detrimental to endometrial receptivity.From a holistic point of view is is beneficial to fall pregnant in a normal insulin and glucose state as increased levels may be detrimental to the health of both the mother and developing foetus.

- Week 2 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

Does the repeated use of infertility drugs increase the risk for cancer? Does PCOS increase the risk of ovarian or uterine or cervical cancer?

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

There is no clear evidence in the literature to date of an increase in cancer rates among IVF patients. However, there is definite evidence that continuous use of clomifene citrate for 12 consecutive months, may lead to ovarian cancer. Untreated PCOS has an increased prevalence of endometrial cancer.

What is the longest that an anovulatory PCOS patient should go without having her uterine lining shed? Can waiting too long pose adverse health effects? Is it advisable to alternate natural cycles with contraceptive pill cycles to prevent excessively long cycles? What is the best approach to take while trying naturally?

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

The longest period should be 3-4 months. Waiting too long to withdraw can lead to endometrial hyperplasia (abnormal thickening of the lining) If pregnancy is not an issue, staying on the pill will give the added benefit of monthly shedding. If a pregnancy is wished for, the best route to follow would be ovulation induction

According to our discussion last week, excessive stimulation has a negative impact on productive ovarian response (good quality eggs). Does taking a lower dose of fertility drugs improve your chances of becoming pregnant with IVF? And if so why? See: http://infertilityblog.blogspot.com/…imulation.html

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

New literature supports the fact that excessive stimulation is detrimental to the outcome of an IVF cycle from the point of view that it has a negative effect on the endometrial lining from an implantation point of view. According to ISMAAR, a milder approach may lead to a better outcome.

What is the longest that an anovulatory PCOS patient should go without having her uterine lining shed? Can waiting too long pose adverse health effects? Is it advisable to alternate natural cycles with contraceptive pill cycles to prevent excessively long cycles? What is the best approach to take while trying naturally?

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

ANSWER

The longest period should be 3-4 months. Waiting too long to withdraw can lead to endometrial hyperplasia (abnormal thickening of the lining) If pregnancy is not an issue, staying on the pill will give the added benefit of monthly shedding. If a pregnancy is wished for, the best route to follow would be ovulation induction.

- Week 3 answers kindly provided by Dr. Stephan Volschenk -

QUESTION?

You got a good question?
Ask it here >>

CATEGORIES


ARCHIVES